Thank you. I'm going to pick up where Mr. Fisher was.
Good to see you, Mr. Boyd, again. I think the mustache might be new, though. I didn't recognize you at first.
I very much share Mr. Fisher's concerns. I get the sense that it may be a question of culture within government. If this is a cabinet directive and has been a long-standing cabinet directive that everything that passes through has to have this assessment, and the snapshot that the commissioner audited found that the compliance rate was a little less than 0.3%, I don't know how anyone can see that as a tool that is anything other than a joke. That 0.3%...obviously it's something that you just used by accident sometimes.
As to the memorandums to cabinet, that feels like a Yes, Minister scenario where you have 250 notes to my present colleague, Mr. Fast, and only 110 out of 250 were passing through this environmental lens in describing.... Is it a question of culture?
I'll put the question to you, Mr. Linklater, and you may not be comfortable with this. Should there be some consequence when we are failing to achieve this cabinet directive?