My recollection of Kearl is that it was a case brought by Pembina, and yes, it did result in the review going back to the panel and it rectified the omissions in its assessment.
Prof. Nigel Bankes
My recollection of Kearl is that it was a case brought by Pembina, and yes, it did result in the review going back to the panel and it rectified the omissions in its assessment.
See context to find out what was said next.