But we wouldn't at all, though, right? It's not at all marginal. I'm on the foreign affairs committee normally, and I was part of a trip to Inuvik recently. We met with leaders in Inuvik who expressed frustration about the fact that they're sitting on a whole bunch of natural gas that they see as a great opportunity for production and export.
Now if we could develop our natural gas resources in the north, if we could be exporting more of that to partners in Asia, that would quite clearly, I think, have positive consequences in terms of reducing global emissions, but it might also involve significant development of a non-renewable resource in Canada.
I don't know for sure, but I suspect that your organization might be skeptical of the proposition of developing more of our energy resources in the north, but if they're developed for export and are displacing less-clean sources of fuel, isn't that positive in terms of responding to the global challenge at a global level?