Mr. Chair, thank you.
I would like to follow up on both Mr. Fast and Ms. Dzerowicz's discussion of efficient tax subsidies. Something's efficient if you produce more with less, but you have two goals here. You have the goal of expanding the economy in certain sectors, which will actually be inefficient in a sense that it's going to produce more pollution.
How do you then deal with the contradiction? If a subsidy is efficient in the oil and gas sector, it means you produce more oil and gas with less, but for environmental purposes, something that is efficient is actually inefficient because you want to produce less of that stuff. Am I being too simple and too binary?