Okay.
This is in relation to where Mr. Stetski was going at the end of his comments about your report tomorrow. I know you can't divulge any of the information in the report, but I want to ask one thing about it.
When you say you're looking at a price on pollution and the impact, or the amount it needs to get to by 2030 in order to meet our GHG emissions, is that taking into account the other 50-plus measures that are in place by government? In other words, will you be balancing that analysis across all measures that are being taken in order to meet that target, or are you using only this one measurement? If so, what is the value in doing that analysis if you're not going to take into consideration all of the measures that will be in place to deal with a GHG emissions reduction?