I have to have coffee.
I'm going to jump down the list quickly here. I'm not even sure who I want to ask this question of, but I think I want to ask Beta. Does CEPA adequately take into account vulnerable populations as communities of greater risk?
I'm thinking about an example, and I might get this wrong, but mercury is much more prevalent in northern communities. I'm not sure if that's fish, or if that's environment, or if that's man made. Who knows, it could be light bulbs in the garbage can, but do you think CEPA takes that into account?