I also got great value from the discussion around this table.
In terms of process going forward and how we want to frame any future studies, I think we want to make sure that the studies we undertake are significantly focused so we actually get the value out of them. In other words, there's a suggestion that we do a review of CEPA, and maybe that wasn't the full suggestion, but if we were going to do a review of CEPA, with all of the different headings that William mentioned, for example, it could take years for us to complete. Most studies take five or ten sessions and they're done. So they have to be very focused.
I appreciated William's comment about the bankruptcy legislation and some of its shortcomings when it comes to environmental protection. That's something that could be undertaken in a relatively short study. You could get that accomplished and then move on to something else, rather than doing a comprehensive study of a larger and broader piece of legislation.
As a note to Darren, we did actually fund recreational infrastructure under the rink program. You may remember it.