Again, I want to go Ms. Gelfand on the gas tax. I think you know that we're not being combative, but that we're just trying to get to the root of some of these issues.
In 2005, that agreement was exclusively focused on environmentally oriented projects. The Conservative government in 2014 decided to expand the projects to reflect additional priorities that the municipalities had. It's not to the discredit of the Conservative government that this was done. In fact, it's a credit to that government that indeed it listened to 4,000 municipalities across this country and said, you've got priorities that may not fall into that very narrow group of projects.
The 2014 agreement doesn't carry the reporting requirement and doesn't carry a singular focus on environmentally sustainable projects, yet your report still suggests that reporting and collection of data should continue going forward. You do understand that when you collect data and try to determine greenhouse gas emissions, whether at the municipal, federal, or provincial level, that's an expensive undertaking, especially if you're talking about upstream and downstream impacts?
Are you suggesting that the federal government carry on based on the report that you've issued?