That's an awesome question and it makes me think it might be an awesome audit to do. We did not look at the issue of whether or not we were investing in low-emission infrastructure. We had two audits that dealt with infrastructure. One was on the gas tax fund.
The reason I got interested in the gas tax fund was that round one had clear objectives related to cleaner air, cleaner water, and reduced greenhouse gas emissions, $13 billion. I wanted to go and find out, did we get that or not? What happened with all that funding? So that was one area we looked at.
Furthermore, we then looked at mitigating against severe weather. We looked at the tools the federal government provides, and then the mitigation funding. In terms of mitigation funding, what we found was that a lot of it is actually left on the table.
To answer your specific question, we didn't look at low-emission infrastructure. We can tell you that at the time of our audit, Infrastructure Canada did not have a mandate to consider climate change or innovation. Low-emission infrastructure would be both climate-related and innovation-related. At the time they didn't have that mandate. Perhaps they have it now, but at the time they didn't have it.