There's not anything wrong, as such, with that map. As a matter of fact, one could argue that if it's really important, then how is it that 50% of it is really important...? Some people might ask that question. Well, obviously, it's important for a reason. It is biologically and ecologically significant and sensitive and what have you.
The Inuit map very much would lie over that; they've identified areas that are in some cases smaller, but almost all.... Again, I'm not speaking for Inuit, but if you look at a map of where Inuit live, at the map of ecologically and biologically significant areas, and at the map of what they've identified from a historical use and occupancy perspective, you can see that they might have been nomadic people who eventually settled in communities, but they moved and eventually settled in places that are critical wildlife habitat.
They are critical. From a migration perspective for belugas, narwhal, seals, and polar bears, the Fury and Hecla Strait is critically important. It's practically insignificant from a shipping perspective, but a no-brainer from a protection perspective. An MPA can and should be established in that area. There have been discussions on it; they should be back to it now. They should have been back to it last winter. The discussions on that area should already have started between DFO and the Qikiqtani Inuit Association. Why they haven't escapes me.