Right. I think if you look back some years, parks establishment was about getting people who lived in the area where a park was going to be established out of them, and then trying to figure out how to get a bunch of tourists back into them. We saw that in many places. We saw it in Newfoundland with Gros Morne National Park. That's what we've done. That definitely needs to be flipped on its head.
These marine protected areas, to the extent that we do them, should be close to communities. They should be owned by the communities.
We talk about an Inuit impact and benefit agreement; the first benefit of a marine protected area in the north should be that it is an area that Inuit want protected. If you're talking about some place that's totally irrelevant to them, why would they be seized with that? I don't think either of us would be, would we?