I'd agree.
I want to observe very generally on this point that after 40 or 50 years, maybe it's time to sit back and reflect on our whole approach in the Arctic as it relates to resource development.
We're not anti-resource development, not by any stretch of the imagination. Just to bring up a related topic, actually, there is the Baffinland mine. We think it would quite likely be a very positive development for Nunavut.
That said, we have to bear in mind that for 40 or 50 years some people have chased the dream of Arctic oil and gas, and with one small exception, there has been no oil and gas hauled out of the Canadian Arctic—well, two minor exceptions, I guess.
Regarding mines, can you tell me what the longest-operating mine in the Canadian Arctic has been? It's less than 25 years. There's no mine in the Canadian Arctic that has lasted longer than 25 years. Are these important? Yes. If they can be done in a sustainable way, great, but these things are not big economic drivers. They're not big taxation or royalty drivers, so it's time to look at it a bit differently.