To that point—and I appreciate the comments that Mr. Fast made—if we want to have questioning over the potential policy that's created as to how you select these sites, then I could see how that discussion could be warranted. But when we're basically asking to have a hearing on one particular location that already has a policy in place and a procedure as to how to determine what that location would be in consultation with the minister's office, then I don't see the benefit. I could appreciate it if our objective was to craft or help alter an existing policy, but not necessarily with respect to one particular location.
On February 23rd, 2016. See this statement in context.