—and in half the cases those conditions, which are held up to give the public that confidence that you need them to have, weren't tracked in that they were inadequate and your systems were outdated. This causes me and perhaps many Canadians great concern, considering the risks of a pipeline failure. There are about two major failures per year in Canada, according to you and the Alberta regulator.
Take one that didn't happen in Canada, in Kalamazoo, and this is a quote from the Environmental Protection Agency about the condition of safety at the company that spilled, I think it was, four million litres of bitumen:
This investigation identified a complete breakdown of safety at Enbridge. Their employees performed like Keystone Kops and failed to recognize their pipeline had ruptured and continued to pump crude into the environment....
If you're not tracking half the conditions and you're unable to report as to whether the company is following through, does this not prime us for similar accidents in which the culture of safety is not adequate to protect Canadians?