As a final comment, if I heard what Parks Canada indicated, it would be a concern for me, too, to hear that this hadn't been discussed. It seems like there have been a lot of very finely detailed negotiations to get to this piece. If we could be jeopardizing something, we'd have to really look at the risks of doing that. Again, the message I'm hearing is that Parks Canada is happy with the legislation as it's being put forward. That makes me happy with the legislation as it's being put forward, without the amendment.
On December 13th, 2016. See this statement in context.