I very much appreciate Mr. Gerretsen's magnanimity. To perhaps further that even forward and hopefully invite consensus in committee, why don't we have the chair begin to contact witnesses and map out a plan going forward for two studies: the one that is listed number one and the one that is listed number two on Mr. Amos' list.
That way, if there is a week when we don't have witnesses on the one, we don't lose any time, and we move forward with the other. That's a reasonable approach to take and allows us to do this by full consensus. I'm assuming there would be full consensus here at the table.