As we were talking on this, I was comparing the one we had just accepted. Mr. Fast just explained what the difference was—that it's a narrower subset of Mr. Cullen's. My inclination, to keep it simple, would be to go with the one we've already voted on and know as a committee that it's on record that there is a concern that we want to get into the clean tech element of it. Perhaps that could be one piece of it.
I favour treating it as part of what we've already dealt with rather than as yet another motion. My sense is that it's covered with the one we just did.