Thank you.
I heard somebody start to say three and a half years instead of four years yesterday, so the clock is ticking and we have a lot of work to do.
Mr. Amos actually covered a lot of what I was going to say, so I won't bother repeating it. The only thing I'd like to add is in regard to CEPA. I know that Mr. Eglinski mentioned how large that file could be. I think that's why Mr. Amos' motion specifically speaks to a number of issues—chemical management, air and water quality, and so on—so that we can really narrow the focus into those particular aspects of it. At least that's how the proposal stands.
Thank you.