On regional council we had a review every five years of a regional plan. Unfortunately, it takes two years to review it.
My question, a quick snapper, would be for Mr. Godfrey.
Is three years realistic when you have a 120 turnaround, you have multiple people reviewing it? Is this something we could look at, or is this something that people might consider changing to a five-year plan?
If you have a five-year plan and it takes two years or even a year to do it, is three years a little bit too aggressive? Do you think that maybe switching to five years might be more reasonable?