That's an important point. I think the United States is taking a much more realistic view of reducing emissions in terms of integrating carbon capture and storage as a solution.
You know, for industries, if Canada is not competitive, then perhaps you could just shut down the fertilizer plant here and move it to Montana, for example. If you're facing a carbon tax without an ability to reduce those emissions in an industrial way, when across the border the alternative would be that the United States government essentially pays for your capture and sequestration solutions straight away, it's simple. You shut down in Canada and reinvest in the United States.