Precisely. That's our view. We fully accept the goal of net zero. How does humanity reduce greenhouse gas emissions from 40 billion tonnes annually down to a much lower number, perhaps net zero? Carbon capture and storage allows you to directly capture the emissions of CO2 and sequester those back into the subsurface.
The capital that's needed to do that is significant. The operating cost needed to do that is significant. It does require investment, but the comparison is what happens if we don't have sufficient energy. What happens if there's insufficient energy? The cost of doing carbon capture is cheaper than not having—