Okay.
With regard to a study on the gas emission reduction target.... In fact, in the subamendment that was voted down, I suggested that we actually do look at gas emission reduction targets and how to achieve them, and that was voted down. I'm wondering whether this one can now stand, given that it's saying a similar thing.
The other thing I just want to point out is that the subamendment I put to the amendment—which asked us, as a committee, to collaboratively work together to come up with recommendations on how we can meet our emissions goals—was voted against by the NDP and the Bloc, who both say that their main concern is meeting our emissions targets and that we're not doing enough. I'm perplexed as to what is going on right now in this committee. Perhaps the agreement that has been made between the Conservatives and the NDP could be made clear so that the public can understand what's happening. This is certainly not in line with the NDP that I know and with how Ms. Collins has voted in the past on trying to make progress on this. I'm just really quite confused, and I don't understand.
The amendment that this subamendment is amending basically says that we have to adopt the draft report. This one says that we can do it just while the report on sustainable finance is drafted. Are we supposed to adopt it, or are we supposed to just be in the process of drafting it? To me, it says two different things here.
I am wondering if I could get clarification on that, as well as clarification on what the deal between the NDP and the Conservatives is regarding this, so that we can be transparent and actually understand what's happening here so that we can address it. I don't understand right now what's going on at all.