Evidence of meeting #16 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was subsidy.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Hilary Geller  Assistant Deputy Minister, Strategic Policy Branch, Department of the Environment
Nada Vrany  Director General, Petroleum Resources Branch, Department of Natural Resources
Miodrag Jovanovic  Assistant Deputy Minister, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

12:55 p.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Miodrag Jovanovic

I can try to answer that. I believe what you're suggesting here is the nature of the trade-off between ensuring that we're still competitive in this area while ensuring that we're meeting our environmental objective in a way.

12:55 p.m.

Liberal

Lloyd Longfield Liberal Guelph, ON

That's correct.

12:55 p.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Miodrag Jovanovic

The role of the investment in CCUS is actually a good example of this approach because, maybe on the one hand, you can say, we do have this output- based pricing system for large emitters with a given stringency that will increase over time. I cannot speak to it. That's more for ECCC, but it's there. At the same time, we have this investment tax credit that encourages these same players to invest in a technology that would help reduce their emissions.

As for where these both meet, I would explain the existence of both as follows: With respect to the level of stringency, the concern is that you have to increase stringency in a manner that's not too harsh on the sector such that it affects employment, for instance. That's one thing to calibrate this properly, which leads to your argument about international competitiveness. On the ITC side, they're actually to encourage those who can, those who have access to technologies, to actually implement those sooner rather than later. Even if they may already meet their regulatory obligations under the OBPS, we want them to go further and more quickly. That's the—

12:55 p.m.

Liberal

Lloyd Longfield Liberal Guelph, ON

The tax credit does not include enhanced oil recovery.

12:55 p.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Miodrag Jovanovic

Exactly. It does not.

12:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Thank you.

Thank you to the witnesses.

I'm going to ask if there's a motion to adjourn, but before I do, I just want to mention that on Tuesday, in addition to going over the first draft of the report on nuclear waste, we're going to start by giving drafting instructions to the analysts for this particular study, the fossil fuels subsidy study.

Do I have a motion to adjourn?

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

Colin Carrie Conservative Oshawa, ON

Could I just make a quick point of order, Mr. Chair?

Could I just confirm that the department will provide the committee with the estimates and the consultations with industry and provinces on how eliminating fossil fuel subsidies or related tax measures would impact fossil fuel production, greenhouse gas emissions, employment, investments and our competitiveness internationally?

I did ask those questions and I believe we weren't able to get the answers to them. Thank you.

1 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

I believe Ms. Geller said they were going to get you some information on the consultation.

I don't want to put words in your mouth, Ms. Geller.

1 p.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Strategic Policy Branch, Department of the Environment

Hilary Geller

We are able to provide information on the consultation that we held in 2019. It won't necessarily have all of the elements the member is referring to, but it will be complete in terms of what we did in 2019.

1 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Okay. Thank you.

1 p.m.

Conservative

Colin Carrie Conservative Oshawa, ON

Thank you very much, Ms. Geller.

1 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

There is a motion to adjourn.

I don't see any objection, so I'll assume there's unanimous consent.

(Motion agreed to)