Thank you very much.
We read the institute's report with interest. It had a very helpful series of suggestions for how to think about where the government might want to continue spending in support of the transition to a net-zero economy by 2050 with a reliable, clean, safe energy supply for Canadians. By definition, what that means is that the government will decide that, at certain points in time, it will keep investing in the transition of the fossil fuel sector. The CCUS tax credit is one example of that, which the committee has heard a lot about.
We did note with interest that other countries that have gone before us in fulfilling their G20 commitments basically adopted a similar approach. They looked at the list of fossil fuel subsidies they may have, and then they pointed to the ones that they didn't feel fit anymore in the context of their national interest. I think what the committee has been hearing, at a high level, is that Canada should do the same.