I think there are two points on that.
When it comes to mandatory labelling by the Government of Canada, that's focused on health and safety and nutrition. We think it's paramount that the government continue to focus on those two elements and that if there's mandatory labelling, it be related to health and safety and nutrition, and that when products of biotechnology are approved, they've been deemed both safe and equally nutritious so they wouldn't hit either of those two check marks for mandatory labelling.
The second point I would put there, for someone who's looking for choice in the marketplace, is that there are many brands that have chosen to take that on. There's the Non-GMO Project with 80,000 different products; the organic system, which is non-GMO; and then “free of GMO” labels that others may use. If someone's looking for those options in the marketplace, the market has responded to provide them, but when it comes to government-mandated labelling, we feel strongly that the government needs to maintain a health and safety focus. Otherwise, the public will be confused as to why a label is there. It would represent a health and safety risk that doesn't exist.