Absolutely.
Our position on part 6 at this time is that at the very least, what we need are regulations to protect animals.
We know that attempts to modify the genetic makeup of animals—including through CRISPR—can actually have very serious, unexpected and unpredictable negative implications for their welfare.
At this point, you know, we're not suggesting that we can't do those types of things if and when they're needed, and if and when they've been fully assessed. Our point is merely that if we're going to start to modify animals' genetic makeup, let's make sure that that's not actually going to cause them health and welfare implications.
Again, because of other jurisdictions' being ahead, we can look to the EU, for instance, as a really good example of how to do that.