I completely agree with Ms. Farquharson. It is true, and we have checked it, that they use the word “prudence” in the 1999 act.
Please recall, however, the point I was making earlier. Perhaps that was the language that was used at the time. After all, it was only seven years after the Rio Declaration. Now, in the context of environmental laws, it is the precautionary principle that is put forward instead, as defined in that declaration.
By the way, with regard to “mesures rentables”, in English, I think it says “cost efficiency”.