Maybe I can answer that, just on the way it's structured.
I think the way that the amendment came to this committee was that no research and investigation should be done unless it's not reasonably possible to obtain data otherwise, so it's like a test that you have to ask every single time, and it may even extend to past tests.
I think the idea was that everybody has the same goal of eliminating vertebrate animal testing and in the meantime reducing it, and that's the duty on the government. It's to keep moving in that direction, but we don't want an administrative sort of checkpoint for every single action that the researchers are going to be doing. We want a general duty, a way of working, that will move us towards elimination of vertebrate testing, but not an administrative requirement to answer that question in every single case.