Perhaps I could just add that Mr. Kmiec is joining our committee partway through this illustrious discussion. He's correct that some of the grammar might not make sense. It's probably an artifact of previous amendments. Cleaning that up I think is a separate issue from the question of who we're inviting and why. It's that question that I really think we should be focused in on.
I'm agnostic when it comes to whether we include a long preamble, but I do think it would benefit our invited guests if they knew what topic they were being invited to discuss. Perhaps somewhere in conjunction with their names in the invitation there could be a short summary of the topic.
My preference, perhaps straying a little bit from the specific amendment that we're debating, is that we invite Suncor CEO Rich Kruger regarding his company's turn away from climate ambition to focus on profits; and invite Alberta's Minister of Energy and Minerals, Brian Jean, regarding his government's moratorium on renewable energy projects. I take Mr. Kmiec's....
Now I'm just making all the points I was going to make previously, Mr. Chair, but you're so generous.