Maybe I'll start, and I'll have Mr. Cooper add to it.
When I think of the Canada water agency, we've had limited interactions. We had a couple of early meetings when they were looking at establishing it at the official level, and we and some of the neighbouring provinces spent some time talking about what the role would look like and making sure.... Like I said, in Saskatchewan we're doing all that regulatory type of work, and we don't want to see any duplication of services because it doesn't make sense.
In Saskatchewan we sit on a board with Manitoba and Alberta, the Prairie Provinces Water Board, which manages water that flows through each of our provinces. We work collaboratively. We also sit on some international boards where we work with our neighbours to the south on making sure apportionment agreements are met. I think that in Saskatchewan, with our agency, we already have a good working relationship with those we need to collaborate with.
We do a lot of work in our day-to-day operations in our province with first nations. There are some examples where we've transferred some water bodies to different first nations in their treaty land entitlement process. Where there were some economic opportunities they had, we worked with them on that on land that we own, so I think we're doing that right now.
I don't know if there's anything you want to add, David.
I go back to the comment I made—I think Mr. Kram asked the question—that if there's some opportunity to help with funding in different types of projects, I think that's a space in which the Canada water agency can play a role. If there's some support they can provide and maybe some research, that's also a place, but I think that duplicating work that provinces are doing wouldn't be helpful.