The fertilizer emissions and the 30% reduction that was discussed—I can't recall, but it was maybe three years ago—created a lot of fear among the producers. That was not a regulatory approach. That was more of a “we're going to set this target” situation, and it was not communicated well. We've seen in the past that governments have brought forward ideas without consulting the industry fully and without providing all of the details. There was a sentiment of “they're going to cut our fertilizer use by 30%”, because the only way you can reduce emissions by that much is through fertilizer use.
There's a bit of a duality as well, where agriculture is being asked to produce more food, fuel and fibre for various inputs on the one hand, while on the other hand, there's a push to reduce emissions. We need to say we can't have both all the time. We have to really make sure that we're—