Yes, it's important to support active transport. I think one could make an argument that perhaps even more significant investment is needed. Active transport matters because you change the nature of a city or a town if it becomes built in a way that does not require the operation of a vehicle. If we think about things like addressing Canada's aging population and many other issues beyond climate, building that sort of city or town for people to be able to live healthy, active lives produces other significant public policy benefits as well. Absolutely, the concept is good. On whether the money's adequate, I suspect much more would be welcome.
