Evidence of meeting #12 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was vehicles.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

Members speaking

Before the committee

Hermanutz  Director General, Economic Analysis Directorate, Department of the Environment
Nichols  Assistant Deputy Minister, Environmental Protection Branch, Department of the Environment
Cauchi  Director General, Energy and Transportation, Department of the Environment
Yakobowski  Committee Researcher

The Chair Liberal Angelo Iacono

I call the meeting to order.

Good morning, colleagues.

Good morning, witnesses.

Today is meeting number 12 of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development. This meeting is taking place in a hybrid format and is in public.

We have witness testimony for the first hour and committee business in camera for the second hour.

For those attending in person, please follow the health and safety guidelines for using earpieces. The guidelines are written on the cards found on the table.

The Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development is starting its study on the electric vehicle availability standard.

This morning we are meeting with the following witnesses.

We have with us officials from the Department of the Environment. We're joined by Megan Nichols, assistant deputy minister of the environmental protection branch, and Mark Cauchi, director general of energy and transportation.

I see a third person—Mr. Derek Hermanutz. Is that correct?

Derek Hermanutz Director General, Economic Analysis Directorate, Department of the Environment

Yes, that's fine.

The Chair Liberal Angelo Iacono

Great.

The Department of the Environment has five minutes for its opening remarks.

Sorry, I need to make a correction. The clerk is telling me that the Department of the Environment has 15 minutes.

Mr. Leslie, you have the floor.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB

I have two things.

First, is that a typical 15 minutes out of our one-hour appearance? Typically, we would have one department that would have five minutes.

Secondly, in light of time, I'm curious whether we could consider not going in camera. I will be moving for us to stay in public for the second hour. Could we have a quick look around the room to find out if we can avoid going in camera, given the time constraints combined with using 15 minutes for bureaucracy talk?

The Chair Liberal Angelo Iacono

I already mentioned that last week.

What's going to happen is the extra 10 minutes will be taken off the second hour. We will extend. That's what I was planning to do, so nobody would have their time to ask questions cut short.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB

What about the in camera question?

The Chair Liberal Angelo Iacono

Sorry—what is the question with respect to in camera?

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB

I'm going to be moving to stay public. Rather than you ending the first hour and suspending to move in camera, could we avoid that? It takes 10 minutes to go back and forth. Could we put the question to members around the room to see if that is going to be a motion that passes, in order to not waste more time now and/or later?

The Chair Liberal Angelo Iacono

It's not a question of wasting time or not; it's what I had already planned to do.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB

Are we staying in public?

The Chair Liberal Angelo Iacono

We're not staying in public in the second hour; we have committee business.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB

Can I move that we stay in public the second hour?

The Chair Liberal Angelo Iacono

In committee business, I have to deal with estimates, and I have to deal with the analysis with respect to the reports. That cannot be done in public. It has to be in camera.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB

Okay, we'll find out, then.

Thank you.

The Chair Liberal Angelo Iacono

As I informed the committee last meeting, the department has requested 15 to 20 minutes to deliver a technical briefing, after which the committee will have the remainder of the hour for questions.

You will see me putting up this little sign, which indicates you have one minute left to speak, and this means your time is up. Please try to end your sentence once I turn it around.

The floor is yours. I'll start with Mrs. Nichols.

Megan Nichols Assistant Deputy Minister, Environmental Protection Branch, Department of the Environment

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.

My name is Megan Nichols. I am the assistant deputy minister of the environmental protection branch at Environment and Climate Change Canada.

I'm pleased to be here today to provide a technical briefing on the electric vehicle availability standard and to answer any questions that the committee members may have to help inform their upcoming study.

I'm joined today by Mark Cauchi, director general of energy and transportation at ECCC, as well as Derek Hermanutz, the director general of economic analysis at ECCC.

In our opening remarks, we will provide an overview of the purpose of the electric vehicle availability standard, how it works and the review that is currently under way.

I'll start by saying that from a climate change perspective, transportation is Canada's second-highest emitting sector, and a net-zero future will require a transition to zero-emission vehicles over time.

Transportation emissions in Canada represented 27% of all GHG emissions in 2023, with light-duty vehicles representing close to half of those sector emissions. We have seen improvements overall in GHG performance from passenger cars and light trucks since 2019. Some of this is due to electric vehicle deployment since that time, but it's also due to overall fuel efficiency improvements in fleet performance due to other federal regulations in place since 2010.

The electric vehicle availability standard, or EVAS, program was finalized in December 2023. It was intended to work alongside a range of other policy measures led by various federal departments aimed at supporting the electric vehicle transition.

This included the incentives for zero‑emission vehicles, or iZEV, implemented by Transport Canada; a zero‑emission vehicle infrastructure program, or ZEVIP, implemented by Natural Resources Canada; and funding implemented by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada to support battery and electric vehicle manufacturing in Canada.

The electric vehicle availability standard was designed to further reduce GHG emissions from light-duty vehicles by ensuring a growing supply of zero-emission vehicles and choices for Canadians. It is part of a comprehensive plan to facilitate the ZEV transition and develop a robust electric vehicle supply chain and infrastructure. When the availability standard was published, we estimated that it would bring total cumulative GHG reductions of 362 megatonnes between 2026 and 2050. This is in addition to GHG reductions from Canada's light-duty vehicle GHG standards.

In addition to GHG reductions, electric vehicles bring health benefits and cost savings to Canadians. They reduce air pollution in Canadian communities and reduce health care costs. Health Canada analysis shows that the air pollution from on-road vehicles in Canada annually contributes to asthma, lung disease, an estimated 1,200 premature deaths and millions of cases of non-fatal health outcomes. The total estimated economic cost of on-road vehicle-related air pollution to Canada is $9.5 billion each year. By 2050, the availability standard is projected to reduce various air pollutant emissions from light-duty vehicles, including particulate matter by 36%, NOx by 50%, volatile organic compounds by 61%, and carbon monoxide by 68%.

From a cost-benefit perspective, electric vehicles have lower operating and maintenance costs than gas and diesel vehicles, making their total cost of ownership lower than comparable gas-powered vehicles, even with purchase price differences. Their total cost is lower than it is for their gas counterparts, because of their significantly smaller fuelling and maintenance costs. Battery electric vehicles have fewer moving parts than other vehicles, do not require oil changes or engine tune-ups, and do not contain spark plugs or engine air filters that require replacement. The Canadian Automobile Association estimates that the average electric vehicle owner saves 40% to 50% in maintenance costs compared with having a gas-powered vehicle. The association also estimates that the average Canadian spends close to $3,000 per year on gas, whereas the annual cost of electricity to power an average electric vehicle is only a few hundred dollars. In 2023, it was estimated that Canadians will save about $36.7 billion in energy costs between now and 2050 as a result of the regulations.

I'll now turn it over to my colleague Mark Cauchi to explain how the availability standard works.

Mark Cauchi Director General, Energy and Transportation, Department of the Environment

Thank you, Megan.

The EVAS requirements were implemented through amendments to Canada's existing greenhouse gas regulations for passenger cars and light trucks, which were originally published in 2010. The regulations were implemented under existing authorities set out in the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. The EVAS sets annual EV sales requirements, starting at 20% by 2026 and growing to 60% by 2030, then 100% by 2035.

Canada is not the only country to have EV targets. Other jurisdictions outside—and inside—Canada also have targets. In the U.S., 11 state governments, representing 40% of the North American auto market, have EV targets and measures. The United Kingdom, the European Union and those 11 U.S. states, including California, New York and Washington state, have adopted targets of 100% EV sales by 2035. China also adopted a lower target, 20% EV sales by 2020, which has already been surpassed. Over 50% of vehicle sales in China are now electric vehicles. Norway will likely be the first country to achieve its world-leading target of 100% EV sales by 2025. Ethiopia was the first country to disallow the import of all gas-powered vehicles in 2024.

In Canada, British Columbia and Quebec have adopted EV targets. B.C.'s current target is 100% EV sales by 2035. Quebec recently announced a new target of 90% battery electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids by 2035.

Canada's regulations go beyond mandatory sales targets.

The standard includes a series of compliance flexibilities including early action credits, the ability of automakers to carry forward credit deficits by three years, credits for the sale of plug‑in hybrid vehicles as well as investments in fast‑charging infrastructure.

In essence, this means that there are multiple ways companies can comply with the regulations. For example, companies could sell more EVs or purchase surplus credits from other companies. Automakers could also use their own excess credits from previous years, including early action credits accumulated in 2024 and 2025. They could invest in fast-charging infrastructure or apply credits earned through the sale of plug-in hybrids.

The regulations apply to all companies that manufacture new passenger cars, SUVs and pickup trucks in Canada or import those on-road vehicles into Canada for the purpose of selling them to the first retail purchaser. It does not apply to on-road, medium and heavy-duty vehicles or off-road vehicles used in areas such as construction, agriculture, forestry or mining.

Manufacturers and importers have the option to exclude emergency vehicles. All companies have the same targets.

The regulations define zero-emission vehicles as battery electric vehicles, or BEVs, which are fuelled only with electricity; fuel cell vehicles, FCVs, which operate using hydrogen; and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, PHEVs, which can run exclusively on electricity for a specified minimum distance before they transition to operating as hybrid vehicles using both liquid fuels and electricity.

On September 5, 2025, the Prime Minister announced a 60-day review of the electric vehicle availability standard. The review recognizes that automakers are navigating extreme market dynamics. It was launched in the context of the 2025 U.S. tariffs placed on Canadian vehicles, the resulting shifts in the automotive industry, and the related economic uncertainty.

The objective of the review is to ensure that the EVAS continues to reflect market realities, remains effective for Canadians and doesn't place an undue burden on automakers, while keeping a clear focus on a net‑zero future.

The Prime Minister also announced that automakers' compliance obligations for the 2026 model year would be removed to help reduce the economic pressure due to tariffs. The government also announced that it would explore ways to improve Canadians' access to more affordable EVs, and that work is being led by Transport Canada. The review will consider potential amendments to the annual sales targets, including the 2035 standard, and it will explore possible additional flexibilities.

The 60‑day review is giving Canadians and all interested parties an immediate opportunity to provide input on the regulations. The review will ensure that the standard is effective and achievable and that it supports both our climate goals and the competitiveness of our automotive sector.

One in four vehicles sold in the world today is an electric vehicle, and demand is expected to continue to increase in Canada over time as upfront purchase prices come down and more vehicle choices come to market.

During the review, the government has received considerable input from stakeholders, provinces and territories and indigenous organizations as part of a comprehensive process to identify potential changes that could provide additional flexibilities and reduce costs. As the review period comes to a close on November 4, the government will consider the feedback received from automotive manufacturers, industry associations, environmental non-governmental organizations, national indigenous organizations, provinces, territories and others.

The review is ongoing until midnight on November 4. We expect to receive submissions up until that time. No decisions on regulatory changes have been made at this time.

We will provide an update later this year on the results of the review. ECCC will be moving to publish a regulatory proposal in the winter of 2026 for additional consultation prior to finalizing the amendments in late 2026.

Thank you.

The Chair Liberal Angelo Iacono

Thank you very much.

We'll start with the Conservative Party.

Ms. Anstey, you have the floor for six minutes.

11:20 a.m.

Conservative

Carol Anstey Conservative Long Range Mountains, NL

Thank you.

Thank you to our witnesses for joining us here today. It's good to see some of you again.

I have a question with respect to some of the dealerships that I represent in my riding. According to a recent report, EV adoption nationwide is only 14.6%. There are 69 new car dealerships in Newfoundland and Labrador. Many of them are rural, and they are family-run businesses. They're reporting that they have these EVs just sitting on the lot, taking up space and tying up investment capital. It's threatening their viability.

I'm just wondering what assessment has been done on how many of those dealerships are being hurt by unsold EV inventory that's tying up consumer choices. What specific steps are you taking to prevent these mandates from weakening the already limited rural automotive retail network, specifically in Newfoundland and Labrador?

11:20 a.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Environmental Protection Branch, Department of the Environment

Megan Nichols

I would say that's exactly one of the reasons that we're conducting this review, to make sure that, indeed, the standards remain appropriate and fit for purpose, and that they are working to the benefit of Canadians and also not hurting the auto sector.

In terms of rural and remote regions, we do realize that it's important that there be other right options available for consumers that meet their needs, whether it's for long driving distance, cold weather or certain types and classes of vehicles.

In terms of the 14.6%, we've seen that go down this year. It's right now sitting at around 9%. We think that's perhaps for a range of reasons—for example, the pause to the federal incentives for zero-emission vehicle program—so there is still that upfront cost for zero-emission vehicles that is a barrier to many Canadians, even though the life cycle costs tend to work in their favour.

This is exactly the kind of thing we're looking at. We are speaking to the Canadian Automotive Dealers Association, hearing directly from the dealers association on their views about what we should be considering in the review under way.

11:20 a.m.

Conservative

Carol Anstey Conservative Long Range Mountains, NL

I'm curious, because I do think EVs are right for certain consumers. Why wouldn't you just let the market determine this? Why take this from a mandate perspective? Do you not trust that Canadians, if this is the right fit for them, would make this their automobile of choice? Why take a mandate approach?

11:20 a.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Environmental Protection Branch, Department of the Environment

Megan Nichols

I would say that the government has always approached this from the idea that you need a suite of measures in order to promote and support electric vehicle uptake.

11:20 a.m.

Conservative

Carol Anstey Conservative Long Range Mountains, NL

I understand that, but why the mandate? I guess that's what I'm getting at, because that signals no choice. That signals that Canadians are restricted. I'm just curious about the mandate component.

11:20 a.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Environmental Protection Branch, Department of the Environment

Megan Nichols

One of the reasons for the mandate was also that, back about five to 10 years ago, the issue was that there was not adequate supply to meet consumer demand. Consumers were having very long waits for electric vehicles. They didn't have a wide range of selections from all different types of classes and segments of the market. Part of the intention is to send a strong signal to the auto sector about the importance of bringing many models to market for Canadians, so that the right choices are there.

11:20 a.m.

Conservative

Carol Anstey Conservative Long Range Mountains, NL

Yes, so now that we're in a different environment, would you suggest then that the mandate would not be necessary, given what the sector is telling us now?