If it really could happen tomorrow, as Monsieur Bonin says, this committee is not the right tool for an injunction around the potential risk to an endangered species. It's 100% not the right tool. I think there are many other tools that could be explored.
In terms of the amendment, Mr. Bexte, you said in your response that it's typical of what we do in committee, which is to answer the questions we ask. I don't consider that to be a briefing.
If you really want Ms. Farrell to come and talk specifically about this issue, I think that something would probably have to be prepared around that, with details. She may not know the answers, because she is probably really high-level, with a big machine under her. I can envision it occurring as it did in the past visit, when questions were asked on all kinds of things about major projects, climate, Canada, etc.
I would encourage a refinement of the language or a reconsideration that this is potentially out of scope for this motion.