No, hold on. It's very difficult to vote on very vague language like that, because words matter in terms of the invitation.
I would like to see the language of that subamendment. The way I interpret that, and the way I hope it would be received, is that there would be a maximum of four meetings, including an appearance by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change at one of those four meetings. The word “and” in there can be ambiguous. If we are moving too quickly and on the fly, I feel like we don't exactly know what we are voting on.