That's a very fair question from my colleague.
I'm trying to buffer against the four invitations that have gone unanswered by this minister. My expectation is that the environment minister will continue to hide from this committee and will not appear. The amendment is an effort to ensure that the minister shows accountability to this committee and Parliament, broadly speaking, by showing up within a set period.
That's a very fair point, not knowing when the strengthening of the industrial carbon tax announcement or any further details may be coming. I'm willing to make changes to the specific text of that, but my concern is that we are soon, hopefully, to be giving drafting instructions on the failure of this government to meet its 2030 emissions reduction targets. Specifically in that motion, we have not yet fulfilled it because one of the centrepiece items in that motion was to have the minister appear. I'd hate for us to forget that this was a key part of the motion that you, my colleague from Quebec, had sponsored to bring the minister here. We still have not heard from her.
She is slated to come on the supplementary estimates. Great. The most basic thing a minister could do is come before her committee on the money going out the door to her department. We had to fight tooth and nail to get her to stay for a second hour on what was the first motion this committee passed in its infancy, which was, “Hey Minister, come here to talk about your priorities and your mandates since there are no longer public mandate letters.” We have outstanding...on the emissions reductions target and the electric vehicle mandates that are in place, although on pause.
My concern with making that particular proposed amendment.... I'm willing to be flexible on that, but we have just such a long track record. The history of the so-called new Liberal government is the Minister of Environment refusing to appear—