Thank you.
I'd like to follow up on the discussion about sources of information and the quality of information that circulates around this issue. It has been raised this morning, and in fact aspersions have been raised about potential motivations of these witnesses based on the ways their organizations are funded.
I'd like to invite you to respond to that, in terms of whether or not you feel that's a valid criticism to make of your organizations and your representation today.
Also, could you speak to where the sources of this misinformation are? Whether it's purposeful or whether it's unintentionally or sloppily inaccurate, where is that information coming from that has led some Canadians to be, for example, under the misimpression that it would be a ban on all gasoline-powered vehicles that would go into effect, rather than a standard for new vehicles to meet a certain rate of EV adoption? That seems to be a critical point that is widely and indeed perhaps actively disseminated.