Maybe I can address this before moving an amendment.
In the motion, in the first part, I believe that's already covered under (ii), “committed to sell, to any corporation in Canada”. To me, the motion is explicit. If they are selling to a U.S.-based auto manufacturer due to a lack of compliance with the Californian mandate they have in place.... I agree we don't necessarily need that information. I think it's just Canada, but that's why, to me, the specific language of “to any corporation in Canada” should cover that off.
I don't think there's a need for an amendment.