—of future growth that's organic and building more homes for Canadians, with repositioning existing infrastructure. Existing infrastructure is going to need mitigation in order to save.... You've made the point quite well that a dollar spent now is worth many dollars to mitigate disaster.
That's better than insurance coming into play after the fact, but even more than that, I want to back up to building in the right place the first time and making sure that in urban interface communities there are appropriate firebreaks already.
I want to get an appreciation of this. Is there a change in municipal spending priorities and thoughts on spending the limited resources that you have in this thoughtful manner? As an example, Calgary is in a bit of a circumstance here right now, with some significant urban water infrastructure and a lack of funds. They have to figure something out, because this is a critical piece, but historically, priorities on spending maybe have contributed to this. Could you comment on that?