Until I see something else, I'll go by the Business Council of B.C.'s analysis, which the B.C. government hasn't denied.
In that context, when we're talking about the consequences and trade-offs—I'm looking at your bio, by the way—I've yet to come across anybody, in terms of the EV mandate, talking about the impact on the land and water. We're all geared towards the emissions, which is good, especially when we're talking about Canada's commitment to it, but nobody seems to talk about what this means to the land base.
Whether we're talking about Canada or South Africa, or whether we're talking about different regions around the world that still use forced or slave labour or don't have worker standards or environmental standards.... Has your office actually looked into these consequences or trade-offs?
