Thank you.
You mentioned the study that you worked on. Thank you for that. If you could send it in to make sure the analysts include it in our report, it would be appreciated.
I'd like to move over to fertilizer. My understanding is that there has not been a new nitrogen plant in this country in nearly 30 years. You outlined your concern as competitiveness, as a real threat within the Canadian context. The reality is that if we hadn't had the Haber-Bosch process discovered, the population would be nowhere near what it is today.
You mentioned fertilizers being involved in feeding half of the world's population. I have no interest in being the decider of which 20% less or which half of the world is going to go hungry if we're going to go down a path of removing the use of fertilizer across the world here.
You mentioned carbon leakage and the fact that, depending on the specific type of fertilizer produced, we have 30% to 50% less emissions intensity in the production. In reality, what does that mean for global emissions if we make it so uncompetitive for our producers of fertilizers in this country to set up shop that they end up moving to another country? What does that do to global emissions?