Won't it just get more and more stale, year over year, though?
That's the whole problem here. It's a point-in-time set of data that does not take into account any sort of climatic changes or localized data. It is today's data—well, it's actually probably data from a couple of years ago. That's the point of this whole report.
It seems to me that this $11.5 million is blown. It's not even available to anybody. There's no timeline as to when it is actually going to be available, and you're already working on something because you realize this is a failed program.