I don't think there's any question that producing high-quality, publicly available flood maps is a worthwhile investment. The question is whether they are spending the money allocated to that wisely. I'll draw your attention to exhibit 6, where you can see what some of the expenditures have been in the first couple of fiscal years outlined there and how much remains unspent.
The question of whether we're getting value for money is premature at this point, because so few maps have been completed and made publicly available. We have seen significant expenditures so far and not a lot of return on that, but hopefully that return will come.