I'm just curious. It was a scathing report. It's related to flood and drought forecasting. How do you feel about the presentation?
Perhaps you didn't see the exchange. You should certainly go check it out. It was about the lack of information and clarity around how $11.5 million was spent on data that's already out of date, can't be updated and is proprietary to the owner. I'm curious about your thoughts on the recommendations from the environment commissioner.