Is it a question that's being entertained right now, though?
I don't want first nations to be misled in terms of a formal consultation accommodation process—as per the Haida court case of 2004—as opposed to something of just getting some type of comment from 600 bands, say, by email, fax or letter. That is not consultation as per section 35.
If you can get back to me with an answer, that would be great, too.
