Thank you.
You are aware that the court case was actually very narrowly defined. It didn't expand into section 35 rights per se. It was a hunting right. If anybody else wants to challenge that, it has to be challenged in our courts. It does not necessarily mean we need to consult and accommodate first nations from the United States.
I was very glad to hear about the efficient timelines proposed and the objectives for the impact assessment guidelines. We talked about duplication. I heard about that. It sounds very similar to the newly created major projects office. Is there going to be a lot of duplication? It sounds exactly the same as what was described by the Prime Minister in terms of fast-tracking major projects.