Therefore, yes, it's monitoring.
If this amendment is simply pointing to a program that already exists rather than its initial intent in the legislation, why would the committee see this as a serious response to worsening floods and droughts?
Conservative
Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB
Therefore, yes, it's monitoring.
If this amendment is simply pointing to a program that already exists rather than its initial intent in the legislation, why would the committee see this as a serious response to worsening floods and droughts?
See context to find out what was said next.