Thank you, Madam Chair.
Going back to part (a) in amendment G-1, with the shift away from the language of “would identify properties and infrastructure at risk from floods” to “would support flood and drought forecasting”, I understand you want to be more general, but that particular clause seemed to make a lot of sense, whether it be private, municipal, federal or provincial infrastructure that's at risk.
Why take out that language? If you wanted to amend it, why wouldn't the government just add that clause as another one? Why remove something so specific? Why remove “identify properties and infrastructure at risk from floods”?