That's a very concise answer. As politicians, we're not used to that.
Quickly, if a taxpayer's money is helping a landlord retrofit a building.... You all touched on that a bit, but I'll go to you quickly, Mr. Mari, because I have only a few seconds left.
If you're a landlord that has an all-inclusive rate, isn't there a benefit that's going to accrue to the landlord? How do you guarantee that it trickles down to a tenant for a lot of these scenarios where they might not be paying their own utility bills?