I have half a page on this topic. How do you maintain public interest with federal subsidization to landlords? I don't have an exact answer or a complete answer, other than I think you have to decide where you place value. If a tenant's safety and comfort are a public interest, then there's value in subsidizing the landlord's work.
In British Columbia, we have highly rent-controlled environments, so there are very limited ways to recoup some of these investments. Perhaps there could be a one-time debt burden or cost recovery measure that a landlord could apply to the provincial government for. I think, if we're talking about, say, $80,000 or $85,000 of past programs for deep retrofits—